And the MATT spake upon the vigineth one, and thrice she respondeth “LOL”. MATT sayeth, woman, thou art unworthy of my gifts. If thou care not to reply with earnest love, thou are to be cast out into the darkness, for cursed are those who reply in thoughtless brevity. May thine digits burn with the venom of one hundred asps.
Guys, the “LOL Rule” is something I thought up after dealing with several needy girls that only cared about bitching to me on AIM. The routine with these girls was always the same: they’d complain endlessly about some insignificant and pointless problem, and then once I finally calmed them down, they wouldn’t continue the conversation. When it came time to actively and casually converse, they would pull the most epic copout in the history of chatting: the LOL.
Before we get ahead of ourselves, let me make something clear, I’m not anti-LOL. Far from it. All things considered, the “LOL Rule” is a bit of a misnomer, but frankly, “The Single Word, Single Line of Text Rule” sounds fucking stupid. Plus, nine times out of ten, LOL is the culprit, so it takes the titular blame. When used correctly, LOL can quickly show the other person that a particular comment was funny, and that because they are laughing so hard, they can’t physically convey their laughter. Sadly, LOL has become a euphemism for “I don’t give a shit but I don’t want to be rude”: a shameful display of cowardice and lack of consideration. Why are women such scumbags?
The famous philosopher and Peanut’s pianist Schroeder once posed this timeless question to the female sex in the Peanut’s Easter Special when he asked Lucy, “What’s the matter with you? All you think about is “gimme, gimme, gimme; get, get, get”!” Brilliantly, the question and the answer were one in the same. What’s wrong with women is that they generally think in “gimme, gimme, gimme; get, get, get” terms. Women don’t really want to talk; they want you, as a man, to rationally and logically diffuse their problems so they can scamper off and watch Sex in the City. You took precious time away from Call of Duty to listen to their problems, and then don’t even have the common decency to talk with you afterwards. “Gimme, gimme, gimme; get, get, get”. Well men, there needs to be a method of combating this flagrant conversational injustice, therefore, I humbly present to you, the LOL Rule:
1.) If, in any form of electronic conversation, a female responds using a single line of text consisting of one word, it is your God given right to not respond until they continue the conversation with more text.
2.) If you feel the need to continue the conversation after violation has been identified (for whatever ill-thought reason), you are not to respond until five minutes has passed. This waiting period is to give the female time to reflect on her wrongful actions through your absence.
3.) If a second single line, single word response is given again in conversation, it is time to take into consideration how valuable this girl is to your life. Two categories exist, valuable girls and non-valuable girls
Example: family members, girls who owe you money, and girls you are 65% sure will sleep with you are valuable. Most others are not.
4.) Valuable girls can be given a third chance; non-valuable girls should only be given two chances. Each time, the five minute reflection period should be imposed.
5.) Once the female in question has exhausted the reasonable number of chances that you have granted her, promptly end the conversation without any notification. Do not electronically converse with this girl for a period of one week.
6.) During this time it is only permissible to respond to the female’s inquiry of your online absence by explaining to her what she has done wrong. This response should be no longer than a single sentence. Remember, neglecting the female is a tool to show her the error of her ways as well as how deal with problems by herself.
7.) The LOL Rule does not apply to salutations, farewells, and in cases that one would reasonably justify a female’s use of multiple single word, single line responses (I can’t think of any, but women find themselves in some weird scenarios).
—Matt the Wise








Recent Comments